Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Hardwick Clothes, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This was a suit for Workmen’s Compensation which was dismissed by the Chancellor. An appeal was perfected, able arguments heard and briefs filed herein. After a thorough checking of the record, and an examination of the authorities, we concur in both the conclusions, and the reasoning as set forth in an opinion by Chancellor Woodlee. The case is so fully and clearly stated in that opinion that this Court adopts and incorporates it in this opinion for publication.

It is true that we follow the minority rule as set forth in cases in this opinion. This rule probably was first succinctly stated in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Freiborg v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Young v. Hamilton Watch Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Little v. Johnson City Foundry & MacHine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bennett v. Vanderbilt UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lee Medical, Inc. v. Paula BeecherTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hamby v. McDanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Oak Ridge v. Roane CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Co. of the United States v. OdleTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API