Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
We granted certiorari to determine whether a passenger in an automobile may recover personal injury protection (PIP) benefits un der the driver’s policy when the automobile involved in the accident is not described in the policy. In Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co., 857 P.2d 488 (Colo.App.1998), the court of appeals held that PIP benefits only extend to passengers injured while occupying an automobile that is described in a complying policy. We agree and, accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals.
I
On April 4, 1989, Angelique Scoggins (Scoggins) was a passenger in a vehicle operated by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Schlessinger v. Schlessinger Ex Rel. SchlessingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Tate v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Spahmer v. GulletteSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.