Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Justice.
Appellants the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB or “the Board”) and the State and Division No. 4 Engineers appeal the water court’s order and decree granting a recreational in-channel diversion (RICD) conditional water right to Applicant Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District. We reverse. ■
Upon review, we hold that both the CWCB and the water court erred. In Senate Bill 01-216 (SB 216 or “the bill”), Ch. 305, 2001 Colo. Sess. Laws 1187 (codified at §§ 37-92-102(5), (6), 37-92-103(4), (7), (10.3), 37-92-305(13)-(16), C.R.S. (2004)), the General Assembly…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Frazier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Kokins v. Teleflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- City of Colorado Springs v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Clyncke v. WanekaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.