Legal Opinion

Slack v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 19, 2000No. 98SC812PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

The question in this case is whether seetion 18-21-111.5, 5 C.R.S. (1999) requires the pro rata distribution of civil liability among intentional and negligent tortfeasors who jointly cause indivisible injuries.1 Section 18-21-111.5(1) states that a tortfeasor shall only be liable for damages to the extent of her negligence or fault. The court of appeals, in Harvey v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 983 P.2d 34 (Colo.App.1998) concluded that the statute as drafted by the General Assembly contemplates that liability may be apportioned between a negligent tortfeasor and an intentional tortfeasor.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. General Electric Co. v. NiemetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Klinger v. Adams County School District No. 50Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. Redden v. SCI Colorado Funeral Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. MaddenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API