Legal Opinion

Spahmer v. Gullette

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 6, 2005No. 03SC751PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Justice.

In this appeal from an initial allocation of parental responsibilities pursuant to subsection 14-10-124(1.5), C.R.S. (2004), Petitioner Jennifer Spahmer (Mother) argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered her to live in Colorado in close proximity to Respondent Todd Gullette (Father). We agree, and conclude that in an initial determination to allocate parental responsibilities, a court has no statutory authority to order a parent to live in a specific location. Rather, the court must accept the location in which each party intends to live, and allocate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Scoggins v. Unigard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. YascavageSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Kazadi v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. People v. SummersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. West v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API