Legal Opinion

Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1925No. 25,452PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The Kaw Valley drainage district invoked the extraordinary remedy of mandamus to compel the commissioners of Wyandotte county and the Kansas City Southern Railway Company to remove from the channel of the Kaw river the wreckage of two bridges cast into the river in the flood of 1903, more than twenty years ago, part of which it is alleged is still in the river. It appears from the record that the county bridge was erected in 1879 and that the railroad bridge was built in 1892. The county, it appears, had nothing to do with the building…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Potwin Place v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Kansas National Bank v. HoveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Swartz v. LargeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. PowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Lauber v. Firemen's Relief Assn. of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Schriver v. Mayor of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. State ex rel. Mellott v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Burke v. State Board of CanvassersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API