Legal Opinion

Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1912No. 18,064; No. 18,065PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The Kaw Valley Drainage District prays for a writ of mandamus against the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, compelling it to raise its bridge across the Kansas river six and five-tenths feet, and to remove its old bridge, superstructure, abutments, piers, piling and wreckage. The plaintiff alleges that the federal government established harbor lines along the river, which lines coincide substantially with those established by the plaintiff for a levee; that by statute the plaintiff is given authority to determine the height of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Cummings v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. CB & Q. RAILWAY v. Drainage Comm'rs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Todd v. Kaw Valley Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Jackson-Walker Coal & Material Co. v. HodgesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1918
  5. Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API