Legal Opinion

Kaw Valley Drainage District v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1916No. 19,115PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel obedience .to an order of The Kaw Valley Drainage District requiring The Missouri Pacific Railway Company to remove one of its bridges across the Kansas river because its low elevation, many piers, its southern abutment, riprap and filling obstruct .the channel and free flow of flood waters to such an extent as to menace the lives and property of the people residing or doing business in the bottoms of Kansas City, Kan.

Before going into the details of this controversy, a general…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Mellott v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Frey v. WilleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API