Legal Opinion
State v. Matthews
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1974No. Cr. 450PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, Judge.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of possession of marijuana, and asserts that his conviction was based upon a violation of the search-and-seizure provisions of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which provides :
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Section 18…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RonngrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.