Legal Opinion
State v. Haverluk
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 2000No. 20000077PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State of North Dakota appeals from a district court order suppressing evidence. Concluding the district court erred in its application of the law, we reverse.
I
[¶ 2] Belfield police officer Michael Gant and Belfield police chief Eric Ahrens responded to a complaint from an employee of the Super Pumper Station Store in Bel-field, North Dakota. The employee’s complaint alleged a customer in the store’s parking lot was making “fists gestures” at employees. When the officers arrived, they attempted to speak to Neal Matt Haverluk, who was seated in a car in the store’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TognottiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Rist v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. UtvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.