Legal Opinion

State v. Courtney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1975No. 7526SC21PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant erroneously groups three exceptions under his first assignment of error. Exception No. 1 relates to the denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure on the part of the State to grant him a speedy trial, while exceptions No. 2 and 3 relate to the denial of his motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, respectively. These exceptions present distinct and different questions of law. “ . . . This method of grouping exceptions does not conform with the Rules of Practice in this Court. Rule 19(c) provides that all exceptions relied on shall…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. FloarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API