Legal Opinion

State v. Riddle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 7924SC725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Defendants Riddle and Maida assign as error the failure of the trial court to grant their motions for dismissal. Defendants contend the State did not introduce sufficient evidence to establish the elements of the crime of riot. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-288.2(a) the component elements that constitute the crime of riot are as follows:

*36(1) Public disturbance;(2) Assemblage;(3) Three or more persons;(4) Disorderly and violent conduct, or the imminent threat of such conduct; and(5) Results in injury or damages to persons or property or creates a clear and present danger…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BlizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. People v. LacalloColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API