Legal Opinion

State v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1973No. 738SC62PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the admission of testimony by the nurse and treating physician, particularly their testimony with respect to the matchbox and its contents. She contends that the evidence was inadmissible (1) by virtue of G.S. 8-53 and (2) for the reason that it resulted from an illegal search and seizure.

We consider first the evidence provided by the treating phyisican in the light of G.S. 8-53 which provides:

“No person, duly authorized to practice physic or surgery, shall be required to disclose any information which he may have acquired in attending a patient in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. State v. BeveridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. BeveridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API