Legal Opinion
Marshall v. R & M ERECTORS, INC.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 11, 1977No. Civ. A. 74-57PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
The Secretary of Labor 1 (the “Secretary”) has brought this action against R & M Erectors, Inc. (“R & M”) and Robert R. Hastings, Sr. (“Hastings”), former president and co-owner with his former wife of R & M, 2 (collectively, the “defendants”) pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, (“FLSA”) 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., to recover, unpaid overtime wages owed by defendants to several former employees and to enjoin the defendants from violating the FLSA’s overtime provi sions and record-keeping requirements. 3 The case was tried to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- William Dove v. George A. Coupe, James Dovean Jewell v. George A. Coupe, D/B/A Admiral Limousine ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Giles v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Donovan v. Kentwood Development Co., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
- Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.