Legal Opinion
Giles v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1999No. 96 CIV. 2655(CBM)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, a class of employees of the defendant, the City of New York (“City”), brought this action to recover unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Both parties moved for summary judgment and Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis recommended that the plaintiffs’ motion be granted in part and denied in part and that the defendant’s motion be granted. For the following reasons, the court finds that the critical contractual language is ambiguous and therefore denies both parties’ motions for summary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Charles A. Bratten v. Ssi Services, Inc. Acs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Keun-Jae Moon v. Joon Gab KwonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Susan Rogers v. New York UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Berrios v. Nicholas Zito Racing Stable, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Henneberger v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.