Legal Opinion

Miller v. United Pacific Casualty Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1936No. 26137. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action upon a liability insurance policy issued by defendant. The answer disclaimed liability upon the ground that, after its issuance, the policy had been illegally and fraudulently transferred from the original holder to one of the plaintiffs. Upon a trial by the court, without a jury, judgment dismissing the action was entered. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The facts, as shown by the evidence and the admissions in the pleadings, are as follows: During* the year 1934, the respondent was a Washington corporation engaged in the automobile insurance business. It maintained…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. LyonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Gaskill v. Northern Assurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Houston v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Chapman v. MillikenWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McCann v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Busk v. HoardWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Harris v. Meyers (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Chicago Title Insurance v. Office of the Insurance CommissionerWashington Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API