Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Milliken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1925No. 19351. Department TwoPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action is to cure a mistake in the description of one of two tracts of land involved in a written agreement for an exchange, and to compel specific performance thereof.

Briefly, the amended complaint alleges that respondents are husband and wife, and that appellants are husband and wife; that, on August 30, 1924, appellants offered in writing to exchange certain real estate situated in Spokane county, Washington, for certain other real estate situated in Spokane county, Washington, belonging to respondents, a copy of their written offer being attached to the amended complaint and made a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rosenbaum v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Schmidt v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Klitten v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Tenco, Inc. v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kaufmann v. WoodardWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Miller v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API