Chapman v. Milliken
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— This action is to cure a mistake in the description of one of two tracts of land involved in a written agreement for an exchange, and to compel specific performance thereof.
Briefly, the amended complaint alleges that respondents are husband and wife, and that appellants are husband and wife; that, on August 30, 1924, appellants offered in writing to exchange certain real estate situated in Spokane county, Washington, for certain other real estate situated in Spokane county, Washington, belonging to respondents, a copy of their written offer being attached to the amended complaint and made a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
- Rosenbaum v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Schmidt v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Klitten v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Tenco, Inc. v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Kaufmann v. WoodardWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Miller v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.