Legal Opinion

McCann v. Reeder

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1934No. 24819. En BancPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is a garnishment proceeding wherein respondent seeks to recover from appellant, the garnishee, payment of a judgment which respondent had previously recovered in the main action against defendants for damages arising out of an automobile collision. A hearing before the court, without a jury, resulted in findings and conclusions favorable to respondent, followed by a judgment against appellant in the full amount originally recovered against the defendants, with costs and interest. The garnishee has appealed from the judgment against it.

The facts are these: For some years prior to June 3,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hayes v. Automobile Insurance ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Houston v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Barkley v. KerfootWashington Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Kay v. Occidental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hein v. Family Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Prosser Commission Co. v. Guaranty National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API