Legal Opinion
Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2017No. 15-55727PublishedCited by 187 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide whether, to obtain class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, class representatives must demonstrate that there is an “administratively feasible” means of identifying absent class members. Defendant-Appellant ConAgra Foods, . Inc. (“ConAgra”) urges us to reverse class certification because the district court did not require Plaintiff-Appellee Robert Briseno and the other named class representatives (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) to proffer a reliable way to identify members of the certified classes…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PetrobrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. ASD Specialty Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Nimesh Patel v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- True Health Chiropractic, Inc. v. McKesson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Timothy Cherry v. Dometic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.