Legal Opinion

Putman v. Zeluff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1964No. Calendar 130, Docket 50,176PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Appeal here is from a judgment in garnishment against appellant and garnishee-defendant Farm Burean Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan for $1,000. This judgment is derivative of an earlier trespass action and judgment against Roger Zeluff, the principal defendant, whose parents were insured by defendant company under a comprehensive personal liability policy which had other insuring provisions not relevant here. It should be well noted that we address ourselves only to the question raised on this appeal and our holding is precedent on no other issue.

The parties state that question…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Fire Insurance Exchange v. DiehlMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lyons v. Hartford Ins. GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API