Legal Opinion
Alm v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1962No. 3033PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger
Plaintiff below was insured by defendant’s “Homeowners Policy,” which contained under its Section II certain of the company’s covenants as follows:
“1. Coverage F — Liability: To pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained by any person, and as damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including the loss, of use thereof.
* * ⅜ * * *
“2. Defense, Settlement, Supplementary Payments: With respect to such insurance as is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Weis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. DingwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Afcan v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.