Legal Opinion
Clark v. Allstate Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 8, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1693PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellants challenge the granting of summary judgment in favor of appellee which found that an exclusion clause of a homeowner’s liability insurance policy was applicable in this situation. The summary judgment was properly granted and we affirm.
On August 20, 1968, in the parking lot of a Tucson restaurant, appellant Elbert H. Clark, Jr., a high school student, struck appellant Jeffrey E. Niemi, another high school student, whom he did not know. Clark tapped Niemi on the back and as he turned, Niemi was struck by Clark once in the face. Although Clark stated he did not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Vanguard Insurance Company v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Klahr v. WinterbleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1966
- Reed v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Reidy v. AlmichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- CNA Insurance v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.