Legal Opinion

Rotting v. Cleman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1895No. 1778PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.

1Opinion of the Court

Th¿ opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

This was an action on a promissory note executed and delivered to the plaintiff by the defendants. The complaint is in the ordinary form and its sufficiency is not questioned. All of the defendants defaulted except Eamm, who filed an answer admitting the execution of the note set out in the complaint, but alleging that he signed it as a surety for the other defendants, and that he received no part of the consideration thereof, but signed said note solely for. the accommodation of his co-defendants; that on or about the 1st day of February,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. HoskinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Barnes v. MerrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Sylvester v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API