Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Donoho

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1951No. 31603PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This appeal concerns a lawsuit by Edythe Reynolds (hereinafter referred to as respondent) and her ten-year-old daughter, Dacia Reynolds, against Anthony W. Donoho (hereinafter referred to as appellant), to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained by the former in a collision involving automobiles driven by respondent and appellant. The action was tried before a jury. The result was a verdict of ten thousand dollars for the injuries allegedly suffered by respondent; and one hundred fifty dollars for the injuries allegedly suffered by the daughter, Dacia Reynolds.

On the morning of March…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Carlson v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of RiemckeWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Billington v. SchaalWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ryan v. WestgardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Mathews v. BeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API