Legal Opinion

Knecht v. Marzano

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1964No. 37120PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

Carl Knecht is suing as guardian ad litem for his son Timothy, age 3, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the minor ran across a residential street and was struck by a car driven by the defendant, Pearl Marzano. The trial jury returned a verdict for the defendant. Thereafter, the trial judge heard argument of counsel and, acting under Rule of Pleading, Practice and Procedure 59.04W(9), entered an order granting a new trial as follows:

“Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the plaintiff be, and he hereby is, awarded a new trial. The Court’s reasons for granting the new trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dipangrazio v. SalamonsenWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cyrus v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Johnson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Sullivan v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Meiner v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. State v. MarksWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bartlett v. HantoverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API