Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 2001No. 97C20238; CA A100057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession of a weapon by an inmate. ORS 166.275. Defendant represented himself until the sentencing phase of the trial court proceedings. Although defendant makes four assignments of error on appeal, we address only his contention that the trial court erred in accepting his purported waiver of counsel. Defendant asserts that the waiver was invalid under the Oregon and federal constitutions because the trial court did not advise him on the record of “any of the pitfalls” of self-representation. We affirm.

Under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. ProbstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API