Legal Opinion

State v. Probst

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2004No. CR00494; A115154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for felony driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010(5). The charge was elevated to a felony because she had been convicted of misdemeanor DUII three times within the previous 10 years. Defendant filed a motion in limine to exclude one of the prior convictions, arguing that she had not validly waived her right to counsel in that case because there was no evidence that she adequately understood the risks of self-representation. The trial court concluded that her waiver was valid and denied the motion. After a stipulated facts trial, the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ProbstOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GainoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API