Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1992No. DA 431718-9010; CA A69069PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for harassment. ORS 166.065. He was also charged with assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, but was acquitted of that charge by the jury. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his requests for court-appointed counsel and erred by not adequately informing him of the dangers and consequences of representing himself. We reverse and remand.

On November 8, 1990, defendant was arraigned on the charges in the district court and requested court-appointed counsel. The request was denied on the basis of the indigency affidavit that he had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  3. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. FialaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. ErbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API