Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2011No. CR0713875; A143659PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment extending his probation after a hearing in which defendant appeared pro se, contending that the trial court erred in allowing him to waive counsel without advising him of the risks of representing himself. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to advise defendant of the risks of self-representation and reverse.

In February 2008, defendant, who was then age 18, pleaded guilty to the crime of contributing to the sexual delinquency of a minor, ORS 163.435, a Class A misdemeanor. Defendant was represented by counsel. The court suspended sentence and imposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Russell v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. EasterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ErbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. SantiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. SantiniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API