Legal Opinion

Capshaw v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2000No. 98-240PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

Appellant, Gary Capshaw (Capshaw), was convicted by a jury of conspiring to bring large quantities of methamphetamine into Casper, Wyoming, for resale. On appeal he faults the district court for improperly admitting W.R.E. 404(b) evidence, claims a fatal variance between the erime charged and that proven, and charges that admission of his conspirators' guilty pleas to the subject conspiracy prejudiced his defense. We are unable to conclude that the district court abused its discretion in admitting Rule 404(b) evidence, nor can we find that testimony regarding the conspirators'…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Earll v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Black v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Williams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Estrada-Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Spagner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API