Williams v. State

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Daniel Williams (Williams), challenges his convictions for larceny 1 and unauthorized use of a vehicle. 2 Williams contends that the district court erred in allowing the admission of evidence in violation of W.R.E. 404(b) and this Court's case law interpreting that rule. Furthermore, he contends that the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony from his co-defendant that he had been convicted of and sentenced for crimes arising out of the same cireumstances as the crimes for which Williams was charged. Williams also contends that the prosecutor committed…