Legal Opinion

Spagner v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2009No. S-08-0105PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[T1] The appellant was charged by Information with two counts of first-degree sexual assault and three counts of third-degree sexual assault. A jury found him guilty of all five crimes. The appellant contended below, and contends again on appeal, that the Information and its supporting affidavit afforded him insufficient notice of the charges against him, that the verdiet form was flawed, and that the district court improperly allowed amendment of the Information to conform to the evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] 1. Did the Information and Affidavit of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Milton Robbins A/K/A Mickey Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted AdekaleWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Douglas Howard Craft v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Rolle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Dawes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API