Earll v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[€¥1] Appellant Hawley Anthony Earll, convicted as an accessory after the fact to the manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-5-202(a)(b)@ and § 35-7-1081(a)(), contends that prosecu-torial misconduct, a confrontation violation of the Sixth Amendment, and a violation of Kwallek v. State, 596 P.2d 1372 (Wyo.1979), require that we reverse his conviction. We hold that a reasonable possibility exists that the accused's right to a fair trial was affected by the error. The conviction cannot stand, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.
ISSUES
[T2] Earll…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Guy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Talley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.