Legal Opinion

Earll v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2001No. 99-295PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[€¥1] Appellant Hawley Anthony Earll, convicted as an accessory after the fact to the manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-5-202(a)(b)@ and § 35-7-1081(a)(), contends that prosecu-torial misconduct, a confrontation violation of the Sixth Amendment, and a violation of Kwallek v. State, 596 P.2d 1372 (Wyo.1979), require that we reverse his conviction. We hold that a reasonable possibility exists that the accused's right to a fair trial was affected by the error. The conviction cannot stand, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.

ISSUES

[T2] Earll…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Guy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Talley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API