Personalized Marketing Service, Inc. v. Stotler & Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Clay County District Court, dated February 22, 1989, dismissing the cross-claims of appellants, Yirgil Albertson, et al., without prejudice based on the enforcement of a forum selection clause. By order dated June 20,1989, this court granted discretionary review over this appeal. We reverse.
FACTS
This procedurally complex action arose out of transactions between numerous farmers and two commodities brokers and between the brokers themselves. Respondent, Personalized Marketing Services, Inc. (PMS), a Minnesota corporation,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Full-Sight Contact Lens Corp. v. Soft Lenses, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Osgood v. Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Prows v. Pinpoint Retail Systems, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Alpha Systems Integration, Inc. v. Silicon Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Jacobsen Const. Co., Inc. v. Teton BuildersUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Appliance Sales & Service, Inc. v. Command Electronics Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Ex Parte Leasecomm Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.