Legal Opinion
Full-Sight Contact Lens Corp. v. Soft Lenses, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 5, 1978No. 78 Civ. 838PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PIERCE, District Judge.
Full-Sight Contact Lens Corp. (“Full-Sight”), plaintiff in this action, is a distributor of soft contact lenses in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Rhode Island. Full-Sight is a New York corporation with its principal office in Mount Vernon, New York. Defendant, Soft Lenses, Inc., manufactures, distributes and sells soft contact lenses under the trademark “Hydro Curve” throughout the United States. Soft Lenses is a California corporation with its principal place of business in San Diego, California.
Pursuant to a non-exclusive distributorship…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- James Corke v. Sameiet M. S. Song of Norway, Royal Caribbean Cruise Line A/s Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., and Per Oslebye, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robert L. Bense v. Interstate Battery System of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Paper Express, Limited, an Illinois Corporation v. Pfankuch Maschinen Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.