Legal Opinion

Osgood v. Medical, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1987No. C5-87-986PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

After settling the underlying products liability suit, the components parts manufacturer (General) and the finished product manufacturer (Medical) pursued their claims for indemnification. General prevailed, based on the purchase order form for the component part. Pursuant to General’s requirements, Medical had typed a caption on its order form incorporating an indemnification term into the contract. The trial court, in separate proceedings, granted summary judgment for General on (1) Medical’s duty to indemnify, and (2) the reasonableness of the settlement. We affirm.

FAC…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Phelps Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. The Netherlands Insurance Co. v. Main Street Ingredients, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Far East Aluminium Works Co. v. Viracon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API