Legal Opinion
Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1982No. 81-1172PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court dated September 8, 1981, granting the motion of respondent Met-Fab Industries, Inc. (Met-Fab), for dismissal of appellant’s complaint for want of jurisdiction. 1
The action arises out of the January 1981 sale of a used press brake by Met-Fab, a Florida corporation and a broker of industrial equipment, to appellant Hauenstein & Burmeister, Inc. (H & B), a Minnesota corporation, for $63,000. Met-Fab entered into negotiations with H & B for the sale of the press brake sometime in 1980. 2 In January of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Full-Sight Contact Lens Corp. v. Soft Lenses, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Manrique v. FabbriSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Professional Ins. Corp. v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- General Engineering Corporation v. Martin Marietta Alumina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.