Legal Opinion

Waller v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1946PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendant, an Oregon corporation, owns and operates, as an interstate carrier, a railroad yard in the City of Portland, Oregon, which yard has a number of tracks parallel to each other extending in a general northerly and southerly direction upon which the defendant switches and moves cars; ‘ ‘ that the ground area between said tracks is in use by defendant’s employees as a footpath in boarding and alighting from moving cars in the performance of their duties and when said ground area is free from depressions, holes, mud, water and debris it affords a reasonably…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Forbes Company v. MacNeelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Nunez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dudley v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cowden v. EARLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API