Waller v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
The complaint alleges that the defendant, an Oregon corporation, owns and operates, as an interstate carrier, a railroad yard in the City of Portland, Oregon, which yard has a number of tracks parallel to each other extending in a general northerly and southerly direction upon which the defendant switches and moves cars; ‘ ‘ that the ground area between said tracks is in use by defendant’s employees as a footpath in boarding and alighting from moving cars in the performance of their duties and when said ground area is free from depressions, holes, mud, water and debris it affords a reasonably…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Forbes Company v. MacNeelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Nunez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- Dudley v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Cowden v. EARLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.