Legal Opinion
Forbes Company v. MacNeel
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1963No. 3128PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McIntyre, justice.
Forbes Company, Inc., on appeal to this court, claims a summary judgment should not have been awarded against it and that it should have been permitted to proceed to trial on its suit for damages resulting from the killing of one of its heifers on a state highway. The defendant, J. Raymond MacNeel, struck and killed the heifer while driving a motor vehicle on the highway.
The defendant denied negligence on his part and cross-claimed for damages to his automobile. The plaintiff-company moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, W.R.C.P., and defendant also moved for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- William Edward Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance Company, Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Julia T. Cellini v. Edward K. MossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Waller v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Charles J. Kaye, Saima Kaye, David J. Kaye and Joan K. Engberg, D/B/A Arrow PressCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Moore v. New Amsterdam Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Daboll v. HodenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Greenwood v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 6, 9, AND 10 v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Timmons v. ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.