Legal Opinion
Benson v. Rostad
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1986No. C7-85-1617PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves an oral contract for custom-farming. A jury found appellant George N. Rostad guilty of fraud and mis-presentation. He appeals from an order denying his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or alternatively for a new trial. Appellant contends (1) the jury verdict finding him guilty of fraud and misrepresentation is not supported by the evidence, (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict, (3) the jury’s verdict was a product of bias and misconduct, and (4) the jury did not consider evidence of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- International Travel Arrangers v. NWA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Green v. City of Coon RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Kramer v. BrunsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.