Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Bruns

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1986No. C8-86-924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellants Kriene Kramer, Stanley Kramer, and Glen Kramer appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of Darrell Bruns individually and the Bruns Elevator Company (Bruns). The trial court assumed in ruling on the summary judgment motion that all appellants’ factual allegations were true. The trial court determined Bruns was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Kramers’ claims of breach of contract, fraud, and business tort, and entered summary judgment in Bruns’s favor. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Darrell Bruns is a bonded warehouseman and, together with his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Cady v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Computer Trust Leasing v. Jack Farrell Implement Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  2. Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. International Travel Arrangers v. NWA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Schoenhals v. MainsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Minnesota Forest Products, Inc. v. Ligna MacHinery, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API