Legal Opinion

Churilla v. Barner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1979No. 811PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

In their complaint initiating this action, appellees, the parents of Carl J. Churilla, alleged that their son was killed in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of appellant. 1 Pursuant to a non-jury trial conducted on May 26, 1977, judgment was entered for appellees in the amount of $3,000 on the survival action, and $47,000 on the wrongful death action. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The sole testimony presented by appellees relating the circumstances of the crash was provided by one Michael Cervo. 2 Mr. Cervo testified that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Shapiro v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Lithgow v. LithgowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Stimac v. BarkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Rost v. State Board of PsychologyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Karpe v. Borough of StroudsburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Williams v. A-Treat Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Stowe v. BookerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API