Legal Opinion

Rost v. State Board of Psychology

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1995PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Polly Rost, a clinical psychologist licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from an order of the State Board of Psychology which reprimanded her for having violated Sections 8(a)(9) and (11) of the Professional Psychologists Practice Act (Act).1 We affirm.

The facts in this case are not in dispute, having been stipulated to by the parties. This case originated in February of 1987 when an unlicensed supervisee of Rost began giving psychological treatment to S.P., a female juvenile. S.P. was treated in Rost’s practice for recurring headaches that allegedly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. HessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Premack v. J.C.J. Ogar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Kalenevitch v. FingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Churilla v. BarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Sarko v. Penn-Del Directory Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Gormley v. EdgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API