Legal Opinion

Karpe v. Borough of Stroudsburg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1981No. 1411PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

The instant appeal comes before this Court on an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiff-appellant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. For the reasons herein stated, that appeal will be quashed.

Appellant, Irving Karpe, received zoning and building permits from defendant-appellee in order to construct a parking lot. Approximately one year later, the permits were revoked. Instead of filing a direct appeal from the order revoking the permits, appellant filed an action against appellee in assumpsit and in trespass. The matter proceeded before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Leidy v. Deseret Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Penstan Supply, Inc. v. HaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Christie v. Open Pantry Food Marts, Inc. of Delaware ValleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Shafer v. A. I. T. S., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Wittig v. CarlacciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Joseph Palermo Development Corp. v. BowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Brady Contracting Co. v. West Manchester Township Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Karpe v. Borough of StroudsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API