Legal Opinion
Statewide Grievance Committee v. Glass
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 26, 1997No. AC 15212PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, C. J.
The statewide grievance committee (committee) appeals from the judgment of the trial court ordering a reprimand of the defendant Daniel B. Glass. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*473The relevant facts are those that follow. The defendant was an associate in the law firm of Spirer, Nasser and Marcus in Westport. The firm represented Comfed Savings Bank, Comfed Mortgage Company, and the Swiss Conservative Group (Swiss). Various members of the firm developed a scheme whereby financially distressed homeowners could refinance their homes through what purported to be a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grievance Committee of the Hartford County Bar v. BroderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. ShlugerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. SpirerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Silver v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. EgbarinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. SpirerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. FountainConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Schulman v. Major Help Center, No. Cv 97-0569027-S (Dec. 24, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ParnoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.