Legal Opinion
Polk v. Mutual Service Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 1984No. CX-83-1705PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Appellant Polk sought damages for -wrongful termination and wrongful withholding of termination benefits pursuant to ari “Agent’s Contract”. Respondent Mutual Service Life Ins. Co. (Mutual) moved for summary judgment on all issues. Summary judgment was granted June 17, 1983 in Goodhue County District Court. We affirm.
FACTS
Polk and Mutual entered into an Agent’s Contract on Sept. 15, 1970 whereby Polk would sell insurance for Mutual on commis sion. Paragraph 2 of the contract provided that either party could terminate the contract at will upon 30 days written notice. It…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Meredith v. John Deere Plow Co. Of Moline, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Starr v. StarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Miller & Schroeder, Inc. v. GearmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Deutz & Crow Co., Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Crow Wing Environment Protection Ass'n v. City of Breezy PointCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- LTJ Enterprises, Inc. v. Custom Marketing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.