Legal Opinion
Miller & Schroeder, Inc. v. Gearman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 6, 1987No. C6-87-561PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Miller & Schroeder, Inc. (Miller) sued A.T. Gearman, the guarantor of a mortgage, to recover a deficiency arising out of foreclosure by advertisement. Gearman counterclaimed, alleging fraud on Miller’s part. The trial court granted Miller’s motion for summary judgment in the amount of $206,604.68 and awarded attorney fees. Gearman appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
A.T. Gearman is a real estate entrepreneur. Twenty years ago he formed a corporation called Wheelock Enterprises, Inc. (Wheelock), ostensibly to hold title to real estate without the necessity of his wife’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Cargill, Inc. v. HedgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Ostendorf v. KenyonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. ChilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sharon Richards v. Aramark Services, Inc., F/k/a Ara Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Halverson v. Schuster (In Re Schuster)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Minnesota Power v. Armco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Ed Herman & Sons v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Davis v. Midwest Discount Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.