Legal Opinion

Sams v. Arthur

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 19, 1926No. 11989PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action by the plaintiff against the defendants W. D. Arthur and Gulf Refining Company for damages on account of a collision between an oil truck and a milk wagon, in which the wagon and horse were injured. The truck belonged to the defendant, Arthur, and the Gulf Refining Company was sought to be held liable along with Arthur, upon the ground that Arthur was acting as the agent of the company at the time of the collision. The trial resuled in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against both of the defendants for $300, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hearns v. Waterbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Lindler v. Columbia HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  4. Helms v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. James v. Kelly Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Booker v. United American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. Texas Co. v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API