Legal Opinion

Helms v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1903PublishedCited by 25 opinions

At Law. On motion to remand to state court, and on demurrer „ to complaint for misjoinder of causes of action.

1Opinion of the Court

AMIDON, District Judge.

This action was brought in the district court of Becker county, Minn., against the Northern Pacific Railway Company and Fred Ames, an engineer in charge of one of its engines, to recover damages for the death of Johan Frederick Helms, caused, as is alleged, by the negligent operation of the locomotive. The plaintiff and the defendant Ames are both citizens of the state of Minnesota, and the other defendant was organized under the laws of Wisconsin. The railway company caused the action to be removed into this court upon the ground that it involves a separate controversy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Wright v. J. & S. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Mulchey v. Methodist Religious SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Wright v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Warax v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Penas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Coalgate Co. v. BrossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Dishon v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Sams v. ArthurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Gustafson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API