Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Dixon
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. October 19, 1894, Lucy Dixon, as administratrix of Alexander Dixon, brought her action against the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, R. H. Chalkey and William Sidles in the circuit court of Boyd County, Kentucky, by petition, which alleged— “ That Alexander Dixon departed this life intestate on the 22d day of September, 1894, while a resident of and domiciled in Boyd county, Kentucky; that by an order of the Boyd…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. October 19, 1894, Lucy Dixon, as administratrix of Alexander Dixon, brought her action against the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, R. H. Chalkey and William Sidles in the circuit court of Boyd County, Kentucky, by petition, which alleged— “ That Alexander Dixon departed this life intestate on the 22d day of September, 1894, while a resident of and domiciled in Boyd county, Kentucky; that by an order of the Boyd county court, made and entered on the-day of September, 1894, plaintiff was appointed administratrix of his estate, and…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
The question to be determined is whether the Court of Appeals of Kentucky erred in affirming the action of the Boyd circuit court in denying the application to remove. And that depends on whether' a separable controversy appeared on the face of plaintiffs petition or declaration. If the liability of defendants, as set forth in that pleading, was joint, and the cause of action entire, then the controversy was not separable as matter of law, and plaintiffs purpose in joining Chalkey and Sidles was immaterial. The petition for removal did not charge fraud in that regard or set up any facts and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Whitcomb v. SmithsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SheegogSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.